ICANN participation

Can someone tell me how a company such as registerfly is allowed to conduct itself as it did, in light of an obscene about of moneys that are supposed to be in place to oversee consumers safety?

Quero que haja justiça: Registerfly.com roubou, abusou, desgraçou negócios, vendeu dominios que já estavam super pagos. Será que alguém pode ajudar? Ou será que o ICANN vai ser responsabilizado por tudo o que nos aconteceu? A ver vamos...

www.blogtok.com

All my comments can by find on my oficial weblog at http://weblogs.pontonetpt.com/joaorico/category/1200.aspx
You are invited to comment all my posts.

I have then filed a claim at paypal to get back the unused funds in my registerfly account. Mentioned about registerfly and all issues I am aware of in my claim and paypal settled the case in about 6 hours time. Registerfly refunded the payment in full, all unused and am legally eligible to request a refund the unused funds in account.

Please.

Someone explain Where, how and by what means are the EPP authcodes created stored and distributed, who initiated this process, and provide us with an understanding of its original intent.

The old way was problem-free for me, this new way has served as a serious impediment.

If it is at all possible, craft a solution by which a request for authcode can cause the domain name EPP transfer code to be emailed promptly to the email address for the Admin contact in whois

I see many posts about the lack of service from Registerfly and the ability of ICANN to do anything about it. Isn't it time for action. If ICANN is impotent, why are they still the doorkeeper? It's time for a class action lawsuit for damages in the millions. Unl;ess someone gets serious ICANN will be considered a roadblock instead of and organization that screens and approves capable registrars. I have filed support requests on various issues. No reply. I got sick of it and tried to transfer. They will not give me an EPP Authorization Code. It's time for action.

The factions of the ruling Social Democrats (SPD) and Christian Democrats (CDU/CSU) in the German Parliament have submitted the resolution "Advancement of the adress space in the Internet" (printed paper no. 16/4564; courtesy translation) to the plenary on March 7. In it, the federal government is called upon to support new developments in the Internet name space.

I got notice yesterday evening of a class action brought to in a US Court against RF, eNom and ICANN.

Although I can understand why the plaintiff is naming eNom and ICANN ( though i don't think that she will succeed in demonstrating that there were illegal conduct from both ) it is somewhat baffling why some other registrars and registries are left alone from this action.

On the process of trying to solve the problem ICANN stated that it had come to an agreement with the registries (all? some of them?) so domains would not be lost.

April 1 2007. there is much to do.
April 4 2007. escalated effort. results nill./
April 10 2007 - no results.
All contact touchpoints have been used.
-- Registerfly Specific Account Support Tickets
-- Compliance@Icann.org email access point
-- Transfer-questions@icann.org email access point
Note: registerapi processing is slow.
Note: Same Transfer rejection Melbourne IT.

I would like, for this short timeframe only and specific to Registerfly only transfer-away processing, to have ICANN INSTRUCT ALL ITS REGISTRARS to ACCEPT RRP as a VALID EPP AUTHCODE to allow transfer-away from registerfly and into a new Registrar by a logged in and verified account holder. In many cases the account verification gets done but the Authcode stops the process.